"Good" and "Bad" are mental formations born of human socialization. There is nothing innate about them. To an elk, for example, wolves are "bad" because they kill them and their young violently and painfully. But to a wolf, an elk is "good" because it promises a good meal for the whole pack. And for the ecosystem as a whole, wolves are "good" for keeping the elk population within its carrying capacity, and allowing the tree shoots (for whom elk are "bad") to regenerate. So top predators--by far the most "badass" creatures in any ecosystem, are keystone species that keep the whole system healthy and functioning with resilience born of diversity; in that respect they are "good."

Ditto for us. "Good" people can be either morally virtuous and compassionate (agape) or skillful in managing complex situations (arete)-or both. "Bad" people can be either careless and slovenly, neglecting what needs to be done--or malicious and vindictive--or both. And of course these "good" and "bad" attributes are mixed and mingled in most people. Only a few (e.g. Donald Trump) are completely "bad" in the ethical sense--being vindictive, truthless, scheming, and corrupt all at once. But unfortunately for all of us, he is "good" at it.